<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>notebooks on Laura Lis Scott</title>
    <link>https://lauralisscott.com/tags/notebooks/</link>
    <description>Recent content in notebooks on Laura Lis Scott</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://lauralisscott.com/tags/notebooks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Six notebooks compared: Leuchtturm1917, Rhodia, Midori, MUJI, Northbooks and Moleskine [updated]</title>
      <link>https://lauralisscott.com/blog/bullet-journal-comparison-leuchtturm-rhodia-midori-muji-northbooks-noleskine/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://lauralisscott.com/blog/bullet-journal-comparison-leuchtturm-rhodia-midori-muji-northbooks-noleskine/</guid>
      <description>A while ago, I got interested in bullet journaling. Eager to get going on it quickly and discover how I would use this freeform style of journaling and personal planning, I initially went with the popular bujo favorite, the Leuchtturm1917.
But I was immediately frustrated when I saw how much ghosting I had on the reverse sides of my pages. I needed to find the best bujo notebook.
Bullet journaling, at least in my mind, demands a higher standard.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
